From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19407 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2009 20:38:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 19285 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Apr 2009 20:38:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:38:29 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9C3106A9; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 20:38:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40569105BB; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 20:38:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lp7Ca-0006Fd-R8; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:38:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:38:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Matt Fischer Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: ARM VFP support Message-ID: <20090401203824.GA23715@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Fischer , gdb@sourceware.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 03:25:46PM -0500, Matt Fischer wrote: > Has anyone yet attempted to add VFP support to GDB, now that the > kernel support for it exists? I'm considering trying to hack in at > least some basic register viewing support to assist in my debugging > here, but if somebody happens to already have a work-in-progress of > this I'd be interested in seeing it. CodeSourcery was working with ARM on this (way too long-standing) limitation; that led to the ptrace patch and to GDB support. The GDB work is in the latest Sourcery G++ releases, which does not necessarily do you any good... it will be in Lite in a couple of weeks too. We're not sitting on it intentionally; I just haven't had time to separate out the patch for submission yet. Hassle me about it if you don't hear about this again in the next couple weeks. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery