From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20667 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2009 19:26:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 20659 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Mar 2009 19:26:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:26:51 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C104810A30; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:26:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96F2104DE; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:26:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lewjv-0005ZL-LW; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:26:47 -0500 Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:26:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Doug Evans , teawater@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: What about add a interface to output the assembly codes follow inferior execution Message-ID: <20090304192647.GA21091@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Doug Evans , teawater@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org References: <20090303170422.GA15154@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:08:53PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Plus to a new user the intent of the option is a bit vague. > > "disassemble-next-line" ? [that has a lot to type to become > > unambiguous > > Right, I thought about something that begins with "disassemble", but > didn't want to shoot our completion habits in the foot, since > currently typing just "disas TAB" is all I need to get disassembly. I agree we don't want to change that binding (I use it all the time). But is it a problem? This would be under set, if I understand right. (Another thing that would be useful, perhaps, is a modifier to 'x/i' to say "a line's worth of instructions". But I think we'd have a lot of trouble finding a non-ambiguous command for that.) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery