From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16980 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2009 19:20:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 16971 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Mar 2009 19:20:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:20:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 14839 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2009 19:20:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 4 Mar 2009 19:20:50 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb@sourceware.org, Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: What about add a interface to output the assembly codes =?iso-8859-1?q?follow=09inferior?= execution Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:20:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Doug Evans , teawater@gmail.com, drow@false.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903041920.51471.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 04 March 2009 19:08:53, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > =A0 show-opcodes -- display disassembly of next line with each prompt >=20 Operation codes and disassembly are different things aren't they? show-opcodes suggests to me that we're doing to show raw, numeric opcodes, which IIUC, is not what is being suggested. "disassembly" suggests to me that we're doing to show assembly mneumonics, which I thought was what is being proposed. --=20 Pedro Alves