From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16999 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2009 19:03:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 16987 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Feb 2009 19:03:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:02:59 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17C9107D1; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:02:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEF110577; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:02:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LXKMJ-0000oF-7c; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:02:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:03:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Problem with -stack-list-frames Message-ID: <20090211190255.GA3060@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:57:15PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > -stack-list-frames > > > > bt > > #0 tmc_init () at qct\services\tmc\tmc.c:11541 > > #1 0x00c1d4c6 in tmc_task (ignored=) > > at qct\services\tmc\tmc.c:12350 > > #2 0x00eee43e in rex_thread_init (entrypoint=0xc1d4a9 ) > > at qct\services\rexl4\rexl4.c:174 > > #3 0x00f3e0c8 in __thread_stub () > > #4 0x00f3e0c8 in __thread_stub () > > Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?) > > > > As you can see, info threads and bt works as expected. > > Please enable the verbose mode in the console -- there's a button in the > toolbar. This will tell exactly what the error is -- and I'm 51% sure > the problem is that you are trying to send MI command, and DSF thinks it's > CLI command, and sends something not right. Another possible problem is PR 9500, which I analyzed but never fixed... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery