From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-33760-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14172 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2009 15:14:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 14162 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2009 15:14:37 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:14:29 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1AFEPT9000716; 	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:14:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n1AFEOu1020070; 	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:14:24 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:14:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200902101514.n1AFEOu1020070@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@failse.org
CC: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Regression
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2

Hi Daniel,

The following commit breaks the signal command on OpenBSD.  Can you
please revert it for now?

2009-01-20  Daniel Jacobowitz  <dan@codesourcery.com>

        PR gdb/9346
        * infcmd.c (signal_command): Do not specify a resume PC.

Index: infcmd.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/infcmd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.230
retrieving revision 1.229
diff -u -p -r1.230 -r1.229
--- infcmd.c	20 Jan 2009 15:33:13 -0000	1.230
+++ infcmd.c	18 Jan 2009 17:42:16 -0000	1.229
@@ -1145,7 +1145,11 @@ signal_command (char *signum_exp, int fr
     }
 
   clear_proceed_status ();
-  proceed ((CORE_ADDR) -1, oursig, 0);
+  /* "signal 0" should not get stuck if we are stopped at a breakpoint.
+     FIXME: Neither should "signal foo" but when I tried passing
+     (CORE_ADDR)-1 unconditionally I got a testsuite failure which I haven't
+     tried to track down yet.  */
+  proceed (oursig == TARGET_SIGNAL_0 ? (CORE_ADDR) -1 : stop_pc, oursig, 0);
 }
 
 /* Proceed until we reach a different source line with pc greater than