Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
Cc: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Re: MI *stopped versus silent breakpoint
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 02:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090206023005.GA16751@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA04E1BF6E@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se>

On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 06:24:41PM -0500, Marc Khouzam wrote:
> In the scenario you mention, having a proper *stopped event for 
> silent bp would pretty much be unnoticed by the user thanks to the 
> *running event that immediately follows (the frontend would stop and 
> resume right away.)  Same situation for the reverse-finish situation.

Is any FE likely to get upset that threads resume without its
"permission"?  You'd probably see the *stopped, try to get a stack
frame, and then get a *running instead...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-06  2:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-21 15:41 Marc Khouzam
2009-02-03  5:36 ` teawater
2009-02-03 11:49   ` Marc Khouzam
2009-02-05  8:10     ` teawater
2009-02-05  9:25       ` Vladimir Prus
2009-02-05  9:30         ` teawater
2009-02-05  9:35           ` Vladimir Prus
2009-02-05 15:43             ` teawater
2009-02-05 22:30             ` Marc Khouzam
2009-02-05 22:42               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-05 23:25                 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-02-06  2:30                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2009-02-06  3:30                   ` teawater
2009-02-06  7:48                     ` Marc Khouzam
2009-02-06 10:42                       ` Vladimir Prus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090206023005.GA16751@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
    --cc=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox