From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24125 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2009 04:08:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 24117 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Feb 2009 04:08:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:08:12 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383B210A3C; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:08:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D1810A39; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:08:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LUCa1-0006aG-0M; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:08:09 -0500 Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:08:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: i386 int3 handling, running vs stepping Message-ID: <20090203040808.GA25113@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Evans , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20090201231819.A9FB61C7A19@localhost> <20090201233251.GA27142@caradoc.them.org> <20090202042459.GA10080@caradoc.them.org> <20090202214915.GA4257@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:26:29PM -0800, Doug Evans wrote: > For reference sake, while looking into something else I was reminded > that the x86 linux port already looks at the insn being stepped. Heh. > :-) Oh, yeah. That's a shame :-( IIRC this works without the fudging on some kernels. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery