From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13389 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2009 15:10:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 13379 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jan 2009 15:10:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:10:08 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A2D1072C; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:10:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5687F10576; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:10:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LQNfY-0007w0-8A; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:10:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:10:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Malone Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: latest gdb snapshot issues with ecos binaries Message-ID: <20090123151004.GA29834@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Malone , gdb@sourceware.org References: <49794F7D.6000506@tait.co.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49794F7D.6000506@tait.co.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00159.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 06:02:53PM +1300, Michael Malone wrote: > GNU gdb 6.8 > This is using yesterday's snapshot (Jan 22) of GDB from CVS. I got the > same thing when I used the version of gdb that came with gcc-4.2.3 > Does anyone know what's going wrong or of a workaround? Are you sure you're using a snapshot? It should have a version like 6.8.50.0.. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery