From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16884 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2009 13:46:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 16874 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jan 2009 13:46:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:46:48 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2F110635; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:46:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591F5105B9; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:46:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LPGwH-00087G-AH; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:46:45 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:46:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: raja.saleru@iap-online.com Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: info watch command Message-ID: <20090120134645.GA26626@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: raja.saleru@iap-online.com, gdb@sourceware.org References: <33036.210.143.35.19.1225860010.squirrel@www.iap-online.com> <59596.210.143.35.18.1226650013.squirrel@www.iap-online.com> <28893.210.143.35.18.1227662837.squirrel@www.iap-online.com> <17669.210.143.35.18.1231238130.squirrel@www.iap-online.com> <43762.210.143.35.18.1232440582.squirrel@www.iap-online.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43762.210.143.35.18.1232440582.squirrel@www.iap-online.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00117.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:36:22AM -0500, raja.saleru@iap-online.com wrote: > by default, it will be hardware watchpoint. for the "info watch" command, > only for watch it is showing as "hw watchpoint". however why it is not > differentiated for rwatch as "read watchpoint" "hw read watchpoint" ? Because all read and access watchpoints are hardware; it is not practical to do either in software. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery