From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3618 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2009 02:22:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 3609 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jan 2009 02:22:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:22:47 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7949410829; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:22:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535E8101AB; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:22:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LP6GK-0001z0-EF; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:22:44 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:22:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Laszlo Benedek Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: single-step SIGALRM issue Message-ID: <20090120022244.GA7470@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Laszlo Benedek , gdb@sourceware.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 06:50:00PM +0100, Laszlo Benedek wrote: > I tried to find the reason of this and here is what I've found. When > gdb starts single stepping [...] What version of GDB are you using? And could you try a current snapshot? Also, what is your host operating system - I'm guessing Linux from the description, but what version? Sigsuspend is known to have some bad interactions with GDB. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery