From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16598 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2009 17:31:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 16586 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jan 2009 17:31:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:30:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA852A96D1 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:30:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id QoEf1ocSB-nu for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:30:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CDF2A96BE for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:30:51 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5800AE7ACD; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:30:44 +0400 (RET) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:31:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Discussing the next GDB release (GDB 7.0?) Message-ID: <20090115173044.GA31296@adacore.com> References: <20090115034552.GF24105@adacore.com> <20090115172334.GA5775@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090115172334.GA5775@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 > > I think a reasonable goal would be to ship the Python-based > > pretty-printing feature. My reason for this particular goal is that > > this code has been through a number of iterations, is in actual use by > > various groups, and is an actually useful user-visible feature > > (frequently requested in the last year, in fact :-) > > Sounds good to me. Sounds good to me too. On my end, I'd like to have as much as you guys think is ready for prime-time. What I would like to avoid is publishing something based on one API and then later having to amend that API... It's nice to hear that the pretty-printing feature is already in use... > I'd also like to have the inlining support in 7.0; it's in my court to > respond to Mark K.'s objections, but Stan seems to have volunteered to > lend me a hand... :-) All GDB Maintainers: Feel free to add stuff to the new page. I don't want the list to be incomplete because I missed one message... -- Joel