From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10566 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2009 22:49:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 10558 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jan 2009 22:49:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:47:06 +0000 Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n06Mkx6I020417; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:46:59 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n06Mkwp6008750; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:46:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:49:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200901062246.n06Mkwp6008750@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: eliz@gnu.org CC: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb@sourceware.org, ludo@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:59:29 +0200) Subject: Re: "coding: utf-8" emacs local variable in ChangeLog (?) References: <20090103061325.GB31571@adacore.com> <200901031022.n03AMq5c027637@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200901032356.n03NuSbX005424@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200901062125.n06LPZUc011511@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:59:29 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 22:25:36 +0100 (CET) > > From: Mark Kettenis > > CC: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb@sourceware.org, ludo@gnu.org > > > > This is what C-u C-x says about the funny character in Ludo's name: > > > > character: Ã (0303, 195, 0xc3) > > charset: eight-bit-graphic (8-bit graphic char (0xA0..0xFF)) > > That's again because your defaults are set to interpret this as > something other than UTF-8. They're not. This is on a standard emacs 21.4 and there is *nothing* in my .emacs that doesn't touch anything related to 'coding'. > > I'm not saying that adding the `coding' cookie is a problem. I'm > > arguing that turning ChangeLog into a UTF-8 encoded file was a bad > > decision, since there are enough systems where it will not be properly > > displayed. > > And I'm arguing that adding the coding cookie will cause this to be > displayed properly in Emacs. Obviously that is not true on all systems.