From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19690 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2008 16:00:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 19677 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Dec 2008 16:00:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:59:30 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FDA10CD6; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:59:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC56310A4D; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:59:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LCyo4-0007eG-HD; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:59:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:00:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Frederic RISS Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Data display syntax Message-ID: <20081217155928.GA29051@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Frederic RISS , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20081217153648.GA27459@caradoc.them.org> <1229528717.7457.2661.camel@crx3051.cro.st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1229528717.7457.2661.camel@crx3051.cro.st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 04:45:17PM +0100, Frederic RISS wrote: > This sounds like Duel I think: > http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.49.3182 > > But this memory comes from far more that one or two years ago... so it > may be something else That's it exactly! I was thinking of this: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2007-11/msg00170.html "data exploring language" - exploring was the word I couldn't come up with. And this fits my memory that there was some copyright/licensing issue, unfortunately :-( Am I correct that the copyright issues apply to the implementation, but not to reading the paper and reimplementing the author's ideas, should someone wish to? No, I don't have any plans to do so; and yes, obviously credit would be given. Someone asked about displaying a field in every element of an array on IRC this morning, and that reminded me of the DUEL discussion. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery