From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20381 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2008 23:04:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 20360 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Dec 2008 23:04:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:03:49 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EAB1053D; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:03:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87C510499; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:03:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LBH2w-0003qq-7T; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:03:46 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Tom Tromey Cc: Paul Pluzhnikov , ajloft@umich.edu, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: "Cannot find new threads" on Fedora 9, but not on CentOS 5 (?) Message-ID: <20081212230346.GA12648@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Tromey , Paul Pluzhnikov , ajloft@umich.edu, gdb@sourceware.org References: <4907B915.5040101@gmail.com> <8ac60eac0810281920r4bf71400hc8171bdee3c92ca@mail.gmail.com> <490909B3.2080307@gmail.com> <8ac60eac0810291830g46604c3eye8365240c48007d0@mail.gmail.com> <490BBEF4.1040801@gmail.com> <8ac60eac0810312346l638f3011n66d7681444329486@mail.gmail.com> <490C75B4.20001@gmail.com> <8ac60eac0811011440g46fcd9a6uda48e1c3b25eb776@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 03:49:37PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: > > Paul> The problem is a (now almost 3 year old) bug in glibc: > Paul> http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2328 > Paul> for which a patch has been available for 2 years, but came > Paul> from the "wrong" person :-( > > Paul> I don't know what it takes to make Uli apply the patch to fix this :( > Paul> Perhaps Tom can have a friendly chat with him? > > Tom> I will ask about it and get back to you. > > Sorry for the long delay on this. > > My summary of the discussion is that someone will have to dig into the > problem in depth. My understanding is that Ulrich does not like that > patch. But, neither of us knows enough about this part of gdb to say > what it may be doing wrong. I don't suppose you can be any more specific? I agree that the dl-load.c bit is ugly, but at least the other portion seems clearly correct and I don't understand how the fault token shifted back to GDB. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery