From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30584 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2008 00:59:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 30568 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Nov 2008 00:59:21 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:58:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173CB2A9640; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:58:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rZ971Nq3vK4d; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:58:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F7D2A9634; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:58:39 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7C0DBE7ACD; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:58:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:59:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Michael Snyder Cc: Paul Pluzhnikov , Gaius Mulley , Sandeep222 , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: How to store function-name and its return values while program runs Message-ID: <20081122005837.GB16751@adacore.com> References: <20618721.post@talk.nabble.com> <87skpl1gy7.fsf@j228-gm.comp.glam.ac.uk> <4927062C.4020806@vmware.com> <8ac60eac0811211410s2196e9a1g28c824850b222bf6@mail.gmail.com> <20081121222835.GA16751@adacore.com> <492756B3.6080809@vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <492756B3.6080809@vmware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 > Mumble. I'm sorry -- of course I knew about that, but I > must have dreamed that somebody had done something about it > a while back... I *think* that what was done sometime ago was improve the situation with function calls. An inferior function call technically restarts the inferior, but they don't interrupt the command list anymore. -- Joel