From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18085 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2008 17:45:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 18021 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2008 17:45:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:44:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D092A968B for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:44:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id OkpztsmXb09N for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:44:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C022A9633 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:44:56 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BFCCDE7ACD; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 09:44:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:45:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Working on the x86_64-windows native port... Message-ID: <20081115174454.GL32364@adacore.com> References: <20081113224430.GJ10146@adacore.com> <20081113225943.GA25230@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081113225943.GA25230@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 05:59:43PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I'd like to see the patches before they are applied but I have no > objections to this in principle. Of course! I wouldn't touch a windows-related file without review. On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:07:30AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Please call files amd64-xxx.c instead of x86_64-xxx.c. oh yes, right. Will do. Thanks. On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:13:49AM +0100, Kai Tietz wrote: > This is really good. I begun with a port of gdb (now about a half a year > ago). If you like I can provide you my work on it. Sure! I'm traveling again next week, and I have had a very busy schedule so any help is very welcome. Thanks! > The mingw64 should be an alias to x86_64-pc-mingw32, nothing more, nothing > less. There were several discussion on that on gcc, and the conclusion was > that the target triplet should be in future on gcc (i?86|x86_64)-pc-mingw. Makes sense. I think I'll adjust GDB to accept mingw*. Thanks to everyone who responded, -- Joel