From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28408 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2008 02:52:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 28399 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Sep 2008 02:52:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:52:09 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA2898417; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 02:52:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF120981E8; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 02:52:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KaiTV-0002Yy-OI; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:52:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:52:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Robert Dewar Cc: Michael Snyder , Joel Brobecker , "jreiver@free.fr" , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: how to examine data with compiler optimization option set? Message-ID: <20080903025205.GA9831@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Robert Dewar , Michael Snyder , Joel Brobecker , "jreiver@free.fr" , "gdb@sourceware.org" References: <1220390777.48bdaf79617dd@imp.free.fr> <48BDB1B0.4040703@adacore.com> <1220391632.48bdb2d04bfd7@imp.free.fr> <48BDB4E2.9010301@adacore.com> <20080902215623.GA3779@adacore.com> <48BDD4B7.5060503@vmware.com> <48BDEDD5.1060406@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48BDEDD5.1060406@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 09:52:21PM -0400, Robert Dewar wrote: > Michael Snyder wrote: > >> I don't think there is any possibility whatsoever of >> somehow generating location codes for the variables in >> the example. > > It *is* theoretically possible to generate such information, > but I agree with Michael that in practice it is too far > out of scope to ever happen. Last I checked Alex was considering implementing it... so I wouldn't be too sure :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery