From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15038 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2008 15:03:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 14998 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Aug 2008 15:03:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:02:52 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5E1983B4; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:02:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E8598243; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:02:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KTeLh-0001yx-F4; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:02:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:30:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andr? P?nitz Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: How to interpret (encoded?) gdb response Message-ID: <20080814150249.GA7601@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andr? P?nitz , gdb@sourceware.org References: <200808141113.21141.apoenitz@trolltech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200808141113.21141.apoenitz@trolltech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:13:08AM +0200, Andr? P?nitz wrote: > > Hi all. > > I do the foillowing: > > - run an inferior containing a tight endless loop > - attach to it with gdb -pid= > - run 'kill ' in shell > - do -exec-continue > > then I get: > > 67^running > (gdb) > &"Cannot access memory at address 0x7fff6ca72a4c\n" > &"\240\240\354\003\n" > 67^error,msg="\240\240\354\003" > > Does that msg have any meaning, i.e. how would I "decode" it? > The message appears also in a non-MI environment, but is even > less legible there... No, it's some sort of bug or bad pointer. Does this happen in HEAD? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery