From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Quoting and the expr parser
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080805202207.GA14077@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4898A8D4.2040100@redhat.com>
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:24:04PM -0700, Keith Seitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a simple question:
>
> Why must one type "my_class::'operator+'" instead of simply
> "my_class::operator+"?
>
> *Should* gdb accept the latter; after all, it's not ambiguous (assuming
> it's not overloaded).
Yes, it should. This is an omission in c-exp.y; cp-name-parser.y
(not used for expressions) handles it correctly.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-05 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-05 19:25 Keith Seitz
2008-08-05 19:46 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-08-06 7:03 ` André Pönitz
2008-08-05 20:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080805202207.GA14077@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=keiths@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox