From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2645 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2008 18:50:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 2636 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Aug 2008 18:50:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:50:04 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A93098397; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:50:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F3F98243; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:50:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KOzhO-0000nz-VB; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:49:59 -0400 Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:50:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Stan Shebs , joseph@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Autogenerate gdbarch doc for internals manual Message-ID: <20080801184958.GA3052@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Stan Shebs , joseph@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org References: <4893427D.1000909@codesourcery.com> <48934A42.7060307@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:37:39PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:39:14 -0700 > > From: Stan Shebs > > CC: Stan Shebs , gdb@sourceware.org > > > > how does that work for libiberty, which collects snippets from LGPL > > files and pastes them into functions.texi, which is included in the > > GFDLed manual? > > Not only libiberty does that; bfd does that as well. I very much > doubt that this is somehow an omission on the part of FSF lawyers. On the other hand, it took me some weeks and a go-around with the FSF to get a correct license on observers.texi. I think it's simply an omission, but it will be a hassle to fix up if someone points it out. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery