From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-32673-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14904 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2008 17:51:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 14891 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Aug 2008 17:51:38 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:51:14 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m71HmbDQ009127; 	Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:48:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id m71HmbfE029657; 	Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:48:37 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:51:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200808011748.m71HmbfE029657@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: stan@codesourcery.com
CC: joseph@codesourcery.com, stan@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <48934A42.7060307@codesourcery.com> (message from Stan Shebs on 	Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:39:14 -0700)
Subject: Re: Autogenerate gdbarch doc for internals manual
References: <4893427D.1000909@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0808011719410.3945@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <48934A42.7060307@codesourcery.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:39:14 -0700
> From: Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
> 
> > You have the issue that's been discussed before in the GCC context: the 
> > need for an appropriate license text on gdbarch.sh to allow parts of it to 
> > be used in the manual that's under a different license from the code.  
> > Good luck getting the FSF to produce a GPLv3 exception text for this in 
> > reasonable time given how long all the other exceptions have taken so far 
> > (getting the manual GPLed seems even less likely).
> >   
> Ouch, I hadn't even thought of that! But then how does that work for 
> libiberty, which collects snippets from LGPL files and pastes them into 
> functions.texi, which is included in the GFDLed manual?

Shhht, don't tell the lawyers!