From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17723 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2008 15:29:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 17709 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Aug 2008 15:29:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:28:52 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D722598397; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:28:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC4398243; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:28:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KOwYk-00066Q-0w; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:28:50 -0400 Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:29:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB to C++ issue: deletion Message-ID: <20080801152850.GA23431@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sourceware.org References: <200807312204.m6VM4JQM007611@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU> <200808011054.24219.apoenitz@trolltech.com> <20080801125124.GA13594@caradoc.them.org> <20080801135920.GA17022@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 06:16:14PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Thanks. I understand what you are saying, but no longer can imagine > why people would find this confusing. Perhaps I'm too used to Lisp, > C++, and the C code in the Emacs Lisp engine to find exception > handling confusing. And also used to GDB, perhaps? >From the years I've spent reviewing GDB patches, I can definitely say that new contributors have trouble with our cleanup mechanism. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery