From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-32569-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26704 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2008 21:08:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 26696 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jul 2008 21:08:23 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:08:03 +0000
Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B740598215; 	Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:08:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A9998100; 	Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:08:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) 	(envelope-from <drow@caradoc.them.org>) 	id 1KNZwm-00021j-Uf; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:08:00 -0400
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:46:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PowerPC prologue analysis
Message-ID: <20080728210800.GA7730@caradoc.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>, 	gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <g6l92j$330$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080728201312.GA3911@caradoc.them.org> <g6la6v$6pu$1@ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <g6la6v$6pu$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00283.txt.bz2

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:29:18PM -0400, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
> Thanks for the link! I briefly looked at the patch and it seems to address some of the things I am talking about (r30-r31 issue) but the comment still reads:
>
> +     All gpr's from saved_gpr to gpr31 are saved (except during the
> +     prologue).  */
>
> Is that in the ABI? I would think that if it is, then the code I am looking at is not according to it (gcc issue or just me not understanding powerpc assembly?).

Sorry, I don't know which.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery