From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: stanshebs@earthlink.net
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Towards multiprocess GDB
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807182141.m6ILfBcf014252@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4880FFA8.3080600@earthlink.net> (message from Stan Shebs on Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:40:08 -0700)
> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:40:08 -0700
> From: Stan Shebs <stanshebs@earthlink.net>
>
> CodeSourcery has a project to add "multiprocess" capability to GDB,
> and with this message I'd like to kick off some discussion of what
> that means and how to make it happen.
Please remind me, why was this a desirable capability again?
Personally, I can't imagine someone would really want to do this using
the traditional gdb CLI, at least not within a single gdb instance.
I'd simply fire up two (or more) xterms and debug the processes
seperately. One thing that could be useful though for that scenario
is the ability to hand of processes between gdb instances upon
fork/exec.
I suppose multiprocess debugging makes somewhat more sense in a
GUI-based IDE environment. But running multiple instances of gdb
should work just as well in that case.
Adding a "multiprocess" capability to GDB is almost certainly going to
add significant complexity. So there should be a good motivation for
it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-18 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-18 20:50 Stan Shebs
2008-07-18 21:21 ` Paul Koning
2008-07-18 21:41 ` Stan Shebs
2008-07-21 0:34 ` Michael Snyder
2008-07-18 22:13 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2008-07-18 22:20 ` David Daney
2008-07-18 22:28 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-07-18 23:09 ` Stan Shebs
2008-07-19 3:53 ` Pedro Alves
2008-07-21 17:39 ` Stan Shebs
2008-07-21 1:53 ` Michael Snyder
2008-07-21 16:08 ` Russell Shaw
2008-07-21 17:57 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-07-18 23:13 ` Tom Tromey
2008-07-21 17:11 ` Stan Shebs
2008-07-21 0:30 ` Michael Snyder
2008-07-21 18:21 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2008-07-21 18:32 ` Stan Shebs
2008-07-21 16:38 ` Michael Eager
2008-07-21 21:54 ` Stan Shebs
2008-07-31 22:04 ` Ian Lance Taylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807182141.m6ILfBcf014252@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=stanshebs@earthlink.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox