From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6452 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2008 19:34:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 6427 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jul 2008 19:34:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:34:19 +0000 Received: from spaceape8.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape8.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.142]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id m6DJXplE011680; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:33:51 +0100 Received: from localhost (meta.corp.google.com [172.22.108.53]) by spaceape8.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id m6DJXmk7004047; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:33:48 +0100 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 500) id DF0453F305E; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:33:47 -0700 (PDT) To: hjl.tools@gmail.com CC: hp@bitrange.com, drow@false.org, dj@redhat.com, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <6dc9ffc80807130857u7c8f72ffvbe53c8dfd376229d@mail.gmail.com> (hjl.tools@gmail.com) Subject: Re: inflateInit? References: <20080710165155.D15CA3F3058@localhost> <200807101724.m6AHO9Lu003165@greed.delorie.com> <20080710185052.E6E653F3058@localhost> <200807101923.m6AJNZBw006371@greed.delorie.com> <20080710201210.GA11942@caradoc.them.org> <20080710203453.4A7333F3058@localhost> <20080710180821.T66839@dair.pair.com> <20080711005501.4CF353F3058@localhost> <6dc9ffc80807121128r2abd2efgd519876c331ef024@mail.gmail.com> <20080712193648.72DEA3F305D@localhost> <6dc9ffc80807130857u7c8f72ffvbe53c8dfd376229d@mail.gmail.com> Message-Id: <20080713193347.DF0453F305E@localhost> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:34:00 -0000 From: csilvers@google.com (Craig Silverstein) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00144.txt.bz2 } Your patch caused another regression: } http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6743 } Could you please fix it? I'll look into it now. Sorry for the trouble. If you can come up with a simple testcase that tests this (I had trouble coming up with a good addr2line test, since results are so architecture dependent), I'll add it to the testsuite so something like this doesn't happen again. craig