From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14782 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2008 09:32:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 14774 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2008 09:32:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:32:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 12209 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2008 09:32:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO guest-246.lvknet) (vladimir@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 11 Jul 2008 09:32:04 -0000 From: Vladimir Prus To: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: Move GDB to C++ ? Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:32:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <487658F7.1090508@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807111328.37355.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2 On Friday 11 July 2008 13:23:34 Andreas Schwab wrote: > Vladimir Prus writes: > > > The inline functions are not specific to C++, and templates -- well, there > > are no issues debugging templates, and who needs templates outside of > > (well-debugged already) STL, anyway (*)? > > > > Last time I checked, GDB had some bizarre logic to handle C++ namespaces, > > but well, who needs namespaces (*)? > > FWIW, if you look at gold, it uses templates and namespaces quite > extensively. :-) I know. I've no opinion how reasonable it is there; but I don't know any piece of GDB that cries for those language features. - Volodya