From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23267 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2008 20:12:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 23254 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jul 2008 20:12:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:12:13 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3DF98415; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:12:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CCC98337; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:12:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KH2Us-00037d-SC; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:12:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: DJ Delorie Cc: Craig Silverstein , binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: inflateInit? Message-ID: <20080710201210.GA11942@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: DJ Delorie , Craig Silverstein , binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org References: <20080710165155.D15CA3F3058@localhost> <200807101724.m6AHO9Lu003165@greed.delorie.com> <20080710185052.E6E653F3058@localhost> <200807101923.m6AJNZBw006371@greed.delorie.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200807101923.m6AJNZBw006371@greed.delorie.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 03:23:35PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > } I'm more interested in fixing this the right way, as mine are > > } automated builds. > > > > But you control the Makefile for them, right? > > No. The build cleans out any non-cvs-pristine sources and checks out > the latest, then runs configure, make, etc. If it's not in CVS it's > not going to make it into my builds. If I added it to CVS (assuming I > had permission to do so), then any system missing libz would break. > > Besides, "you should hack your Makefiles" is not a suitable solution > to this kind of problem. I'm not the only one trying to build them. GDB is safe from this particular error, because it already uses zlib. I think the only thing we can do is add equivalent autoconf tests for zlib to other things which link to BFD but do not use libtool. Mostly, that means the sim. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery