From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-32370-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9130 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2008 19:35:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 9116 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jul 2008 19:35:09 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (HELO host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net) (89.250.240.59)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:34:51 +0000
Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6AJYNTS005010; 	Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:34:23 +0200
Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) 	by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6AJYHjb005005; 	Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:34:17 +0200
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:35:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Stan Shebs <stanshebs@earthlink.net>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
Message-ID: <20080710193417.GA4659@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
References: <487658F7.1090508@earthlink.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <487658F7.1090508@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:46:15 +0200, Stan Shebs wrote:
> For my part, I think we should do it. GDB has quite a bit of object-like  
> structure internally,

+1  (as GObject is unfortunately not going to win it)


Regards,
Jan