From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12241 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2008 23:36:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 12233 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2008 23:36:30 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:36:11 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D0F98413; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 23:36:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1258298243; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 23:36:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KDpOK-0001eC-2g; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:36:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:36:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Justin Ferguson Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: following execve() Message-ID: <20080701233608.GA6316@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Justin Ferguson , gdb@sourceware.org References: <705543260806302140t1bc8c568wea5175b9cc728e53@mail.gmail.com> <20080701124219.GA26329@caradoc.them.org> <705543260807011516t7303e81bk4685e47146a28075@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <705543260807011516t7303e81bk4685e47146a28075@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 03:16:31PM -0700, Justin Ferguson wrote: > Hi, > > gdb 6.7.1 on x86_64 linux, it works fine so long as I dont try to > break anywhere in the new process. The hang is something to do with > signals as a sigsegv should be getting delivered thats not, I'm not > incredibly concerned about that, but I'd sure like to be able to break > in the new process. Try a current snapshot instead of 6.7.1 and see if that's better. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery