From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26738 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2008 20:24:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 26729 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2008 20:24:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:23:56 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48BB98408; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:23:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751B89805C; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:23:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K6tKr-00021g-QS; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:23:53 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:24:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: Marc Khouzam , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Who uses gdbreplay? Message-ID: <20080612202353.GA7771@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , Marc Khouzam , gdb@sourceware.org References: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA042911BE@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <1213297921.3601.676.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080612191849.GA3704@caradoc.them.org> <1213299561.3601.681.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080612194713.GA5474@caradoc.them.org> <1213300611.3601.690.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080612200614.GA6572@caradoc.them.org> <1213301731.3601.696.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1213301731.3601.696.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00126.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 01:15:31PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > I guess I'm talking about a separate program that does > essentially a huge superset of gdbreplay's current functionality, > using the same input logfile as is currently used by gdbreplay. > > In a sense a replacement for gdbreplay, but the existing > gdbreplay doesn't have to go away, if it serves a purpose. I've used it for testing... like once every two years. If it took any more maintenance than it does I'd probably have dumped it by now, but it's nice and simple :-) > Yeah, well -- show me an alternative. Gdbserver? Maybe. There isn't any good GNU alternative that I know of. But RDA isn't much of an alternative either if you want to make a GNU program. Just saying. > This is an extension of a different project I was working on, > using rda. It just occurred to me that I could make it use > the log files that are used by gdbreplay, and make them > suddenly really useful. Wouldn't you need a completely different sort of log file? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery