From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5671 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2008 20:06:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 5653 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2008 20:06:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:06:17 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06C998408; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:06:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8390F9805C; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:06:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K6t3m-0001il-Sh; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:06:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: Marc Khouzam , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Who uses gdbreplay? Message-ID: <20080612200614.GA6572@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , Marc Khouzam , gdb@sourceware.org References: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA042911BE@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <1213297921.3601.676.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080612191849.GA3704@caradoc.them.org> <1213299561.3601.681.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080612194713.GA5474@caradoc.them.org> <1213300611.3601.690.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1213300611.3601.690.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00124.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:56:51PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > Oh, absolutely. No worries. > > gdbreplay is elegant in its simplicity, I don't want to > compromise that. I'm actually working in rda. Ok, I think I've gotten turned around. Were you talking about improvements to gdbreplay on the one hand and a separate program for traces? It's kind of a shame you're working in rda. I'm sure it's nice and all - but it never got contributed to the FSF, and I'm not entirely happy about new bits of GDB development using it because of that. It's still got RH copyright notices all over it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery