From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31174 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2008 21:31:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 31156 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2008 21:31:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-71-248-179-123.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO ednor.cgf.cx) (71.248.179.123) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:30:43 +0000 Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id DCC9CED5B4; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 17:30:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:31:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Gdb List , Tom Tromey Subject: Re: gnats -> bugzilla Message-ID: <20080609213040.GA30044@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Gdb List , Tom Tromey References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 12:28:19PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: >Hi everyone. > >I'd like gdb to switch from gnats to bugzilla. Gnats is showing its >age and is annoying to use. I think this is a contributing factor to >the under-reporting of gdb bugs and general under-use of the gdb bug >tracker. > >My general plan is: > >* Write a patch for the documentation and the web site. > >* Disable Gnats. > >* Get gnats2bz and convert the current database. > This will renumber all the bugs; I don't consider this a major > problem. > >* Get DannyB to upload this into the current sourceware bugzilla > instance and check in all the changes. > >* Archive the Gnats database. > >If you have any objections, speak up. No objections here. Does this mean we can turn off GNATS on sourceware for good or does it have to live forever to handle the old URLs that point into it? cgf