From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-31942-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29201 invoked by alias); 22 May 2008 15:05:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 29193 invoked by uid 22791); 22 May 2008 15:05:43 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 May 2008 15:05:01 +0000
Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3F79809F; 	Thu, 22 May 2008 15:04:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7718C9809E; 	Thu, 22 May 2008 15:04:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) 	(envelope-from <drow@caradoc.them.org>) 	id 1JzCLi-0000PE-Ta; Thu, 22 May 2008 11:04:58 -0400
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 16:02:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Frame lost after 'leave' and before 'ret' instruction on i386?
Message-ID: <20080522150458.GA1274@caradoc.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>, 	gdb@sourceware.org
References: <482DA814.7030703@qnx.com> <20080516155828.GA31038@caradoc.them.org> <48358355.7050500@qnx.com> <20080522143936.GA32221@caradoc.them.org> <48358860.5010703@qnx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <48358860.5010703@qnx.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00160.txt.bz2

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:51:12AM -0400, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
> So from what I can see, they all rely on symbol info (find_pc_partial_function).

Generally, so that you don't go marching off into the code of another
function.  If you only look at instructions forwards, and do not skip
any branches, you can probably do without it.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery