From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2439 invoked by alias); 22 May 2008 14:29:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 2428 invoked by uid 22791); 22 May 2008 14:29:32 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 May 2008 14:29:11 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JzBmz-0002d4-MG for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 22 May 2008 14:29:05 +0000 Received: from enigma.qnx.com ([209.226.137.106]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 14:29:05 +0000 Received: from aristovski by enigma.qnx.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 14:29:05 +0000 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com From: Aleksandar Ristovski Subject: Re: Frame lost after 'leave' and before 'ret' instruction on i386? Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 14:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <48358355.7050500@qnx.com> References: <482DA814.7030703@qnx.com> <20080516155828.GA31038@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) In-Reply-To: <20080516155828.GA31038@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00156.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20080522144000.eVvTPGA0Zp7rbbO_29ew6ZhyxAIixu54xNE_baozKJ8@z> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > When DWARF unwinding is not in use, there's the in_epilogue_p hook. > Prologue analyzers could also detect epilogues using the same > technique. But this is slow and complicated. > Interestingly, the only mention of in_epilogue_p I found is in ChangeLog-2004, but not a trace of it in the code? As if it was silently removed without mentioning it in the ChangeLog.