From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25658 invoked by alias); 9 May 2008 13:31:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 25650 invoked by uid 22791); 9 May 2008 13:31:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 May 2008 13:30:55 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0646983EA; Fri, 9 May 2008 13:30:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D0698371; Fri, 9 May 2008 13:30:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JuSgW-0007Lj-PA; Fri, 09 May 2008 09:30:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 13:31:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Geert Vancompernolle Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB for target mips2_fp_le Message-ID: <20080509133052.GA28235@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Geert Vancompernolle , gdb@sourceware.org References: <4821F173.2040208@gmail.com> <20080507181842.GA8592@caradoc.them.org> <20080509120246.GA23419@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 03:18:58PM +0200, Geert Vancompernolle wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 07:39:27AM +0200, Geert Vancompernolle wrote: > >> Ok, so I assume I can take the "risk" and use "mips-unknown-elf" to > >> try to debug a target having "mips2_fp_le" then? > > > > If you are trying to use Linux on your target then use the Linux > > configuration as I suggested in my message. > > > > Indeed, that's what I've done. > > But the second question, regarding the OS ABI stuff, is my main > concern now. Any suggestions? If you are getting that message then you are using mips-elf, not mips-linux. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery