From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7376 invoked by alias); 7 May 2008 11:39:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 7368 invoked by uid 22791); 7 May 2008 11:39:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 May 2008 11:38:55 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6074E9835A; Wed, 7 May 2008 11:38:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABF298011; Wed, 7 May 2008 11:38:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jthz1-0008Nz-H2; Wed, 07 May 2008 07:38:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 11:39:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Paul Hilfinger Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Question on typedefs of anonymous structs in G++ Message-ID: <20080507113851.GA32216@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Hilfinger , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20080507090045.51A1048CC44@nile.gnat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080507090045.51A1048CC44@nile.gnat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 05:00:45AM -0400, Paul Hilfinger wrote: > produces no trace of debugging information about Foo. Serves one > right for writing a C-style definition of Foo in a C++ program, to be > sure, but G++ used to include Foo in the debugging data. Does anyone > here happen to know the story behind the change? Thanks. It is presumably just a bug (if the type is used somewhere); I suggest verifying it on HEAD and putting it in gcc's bugzilla. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery