From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@specifix.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: the "load" command and the .bss section
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 00:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804302010.59482.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1209406914.4615.297.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1895 bytes --]
On Monday 28 April 2008, Michael Snyder wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 05:09 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i was doing a new board port using jtag and so was leveraging the "load"
> > command to setup the initial ELF in the relevant memory regions. things
> > kept crashing on me and then i realized that the loading process wasnt
> > actually zeroing out the bss. is there a reason for this ? i googled
> > and flipped through the manual, but the details on what exactly the
> > "load" command is supposed to do is a bit on sketchy side. from what i
> > can tell from the gdb source code and the actual output from running the
> > command, it walks the section headers (rather than the program headers ?)
> > and loads up everything that is in the file. since the bss section
> > doesnt actually exist in the file and is only allocated, that is why it
> > gets skipped ?
> >
> > once i adapted my habits to first load the ELF and then manually zero the
> > bss, life was so much saner :).
>
> In my understanding, it is not GDB's responsibility to zero the
> .bss section. That is the responsibility of the C Runtime.
>
> Otherwise, how could the program run without gdb in the picture?
>
> The gdb load command only addresses sections with the loadable
> flag. .bss is not loadable.
a fair point, but i think there is a valid use case for having an optional
flag to tell gdb to do this. you may want to load a bare metal application
that itself would have normally been loaded by another application (say your
typical bootloader), so the assumption is that certain aspects of the C
runtime have been initialized before the bare metal application is executed.
Daniel also indicated that i wouldnt be the first (and probably not the last)
to experience this hiccup and ask for an optional (streamlined) method for
accounting for this.
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-01 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-28 8:02 Mike Frysinger
2008-04-28 13:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-28 17:29 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-04-28 17:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-29 18:04 ` Michael Snyder
2008-05-01 0:11 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2008-05-01 2:03 ` Michael Snyder
2008-05-01 3:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-01 19:24 ` Michael Snyder
2008-05-01 19:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-01 20:05 ` Michael Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804302010.59482.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=msnyder@specifix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox