From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25088 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2008 12:57:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 25079 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Apr 2008 12:57:40 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:57:20 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FD0983DB; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:57:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCF7980F7; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:57:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JoeXF-0005Go-EG; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:57:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:47:00 -0000 From: 'Daniel Jacobowitz' To: Jiju George T Cc: 'Vladimir Prus' , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: clearing call stack when a new binary file is loaded Message-ID: <20080423125717.GA20157@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jiju George T , 'Vladimir Prus' , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <005101c8a52a$13f76910$390aa8c0@ashmicro.ashling.com> <20080423114537.GA15843@caradoc.them.org> <00a601c8a541$1194f090$390aa8c0@ashmicro.ashling.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00a601c8a541$1194f090$390aa8c0@ashmicro.ashling.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00203.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:53:46PM +0100, Jiju George T wrote: > Is there any equivalent mi command to invalidate the frame cache? No. If you use GDB 6.8 the CLI command "flushregs" will hack around the problem but we simply need to fix it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery