From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-31667-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22992 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2008 15:29:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 22984 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Apr 2008 15:29:50 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:29:32 +0000
Received: (qmail 14003 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2008 15:29:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 16 Apr 2008 15:29:30 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: MI varobj artificial fields
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:06:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)
Cc: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
References: <200804161920.02035.ghost@cs.msu.su>
In-Reply-To: <200804161920.02035.ghost@cs.msu.su>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200804161629.31675.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00149.txt.bz2

A Wednesday 16 April 2008 16:20:01, Vladimir Prus wrote:

> So, I suggest to allow MI to optionally suppress those artificial fields.
> Comments?

Should the access be an attribute of the each children, instead of
being children themselves?

-- 
Pedro Alves