From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29275 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2008 00:47:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 29267 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Apr 2008 00:47:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:46:59 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDFA98278; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:46:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F194A98149; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:46:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jlvnb-0006xo-PP; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:46:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Doug Evans Cc: Nick Roberts , Lokesh Kumar , Gordon Prieur , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB MI Interface Message-ID: <20080416004655.GA26462@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Evans , Nick Roberts , Lokesh Kumar , Gordon Prieur , gdb@sourceware.org References: <47FF7ECA.4090104@sun.com> <18434.33686.377360.769555@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00145.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 01:46:28PM -0700, Doug Evans wrote: > Is it lamentable that we have both gdbmi and (soon) a real scripting > interface with no real commonality? Just thinking out loud ... I > don't have an answer. I don't think it is. My limited implementation experience with trying to exploit commonality found the scripting interface too cumbersome. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery