From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4529 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2008 18:19:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 4521 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2008 18:19:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:19:18 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F0A980F7; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:19:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9CE98060; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:19:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jk1Mi-0001mr-Bw; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:19:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:07:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "Roberts, Dennis" Cc: "'gdb@sourceware.org'" Subject: Re: rs6000-tdep.c Question Message-ID: <20080410181916.GA6515@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Roberts, Dennis" , "'gdb@sourceware.org'" References: <4813EA4A50D35A44906A74A5E341D0B61A03388614@SQMAILBOX1.sunquestinfo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4813EA4A50D35A44906A74A5E341D0B61A03388614@SQMAILBOX1.sunquestinfo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:00:25AM -0700, Roberts, Dennis wrote: > Does anyone see any problem with this code change? Not I. In fact, I suspect it isn't necessary for 32-bit either; perhaps you could test that? Are you set up to run the testsuite? If so, be sure to do before-and-after testing; the results on AIX are not stellar at present. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery