From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20297 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2008 17:59:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 20288 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2008 17:59:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:59:28 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A64980F7; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:59:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5462C98060; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:59:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jk13V-0001Tv-9D; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:59:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:10:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Nick Roberts Subject: Re: Non-stop debugging and automatically stopping the target Message-ID: <20080410175925.GA5379@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb@sourceware.org, Nick Roberts References: <20080410141711.GA22694@caradoc.them.org> <20080410174124.GA7163@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080410174124.GA7163@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:41:24AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > The subject of this thread says "non-stop" mode, so does it mean that > in "all-stop" mode we're assuming that the target program is not time- > sensitive, and so we'll always pause it? I just wasn't thinking about the problem properly. Nick's subject was right; this applies to any async target. Perhaps there should be a "real-time sensitive" setting, then - probably off by default with a nice manual section? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery