Re: [RFC] Using values to handle unwinding

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

Thanks for looking at them!

On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:37:10AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > I'd love comments on the patches, the overall approach, and how to
> > proceed.  Ideally, we check this in (breaking many targets), update
> > each target completely as someone needs that target, and make sure all
> > targets are updated by the next release of GDB.  I personally use
> > amd64, i386, arm, mips, m68k, and powerpc; so I'm pretty likely to
> > update all of those (mechanically).  I'll do the laggards before the
> > next release too, but not right this minute.  I would appreciate
> > assistance with other targets :-)
> 
> You said "mechanically" - does it mean you are not able to test some
> of the targets you listed?

I can test a representative triplet.  But there's a wide variety of OS
tdep files with sniffers; the patches I've already posted change about
a dozen targets, only one of which I can readily test.  So a certain
amount of mechanical conversion and proofreading is the best I can
do.

> We can use a second pair of eyes as our means of testing...

Yes indeed :-)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery