From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: "Anmol P. Paralkar" <b07584@freescale.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Regenerate config/features/rs6000
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080401203615.GA5522@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804011446540.19389@ld0159-tx32.am.freescale.net>
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 03:22:05PM -0500, Anmol P. Paralkar wrote:
>> Meanwhile, I'd love to remove the circular dependency, but I haven't
>> thought of a way to do it yet.
>
> When you say circular dependency, you mean using a GDB to generate a
> part of itself, right? For variants of existing architecures this not
> so non-intuitive. However, when adding a brand new arch. (e.g. say if we
> had XML descriptions in place and were adding support for the e500),
The e500 is not a brand new architecture, as far as GDB is concerned.
It's what I was calling a variant. It's adding XML support to a new
foo*-* target that's really awkward.
> one has to teach it about the new architecture first, else it's not
> going to like the: <architecture>powerpc:e500</architecture> resulting in:
>
> warning: while parsing target description (at line <?>): Target description specified unknown architecture "powerpc:e500"
> warning: Could not load XML target description; ignoring
> There is no target description to print.
>
> For a situation like that, is there a simpler process than/alternative to
> the one I outlined in my previous mail?
I see. All you need to add before you can do this is the BFD bits;
you shouldn't need to add it to GDB's list, but PowerPC might be
special in this regard.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-01 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-31 23:58 Michael Eager
[not found] ` <20080331234135.GA29623@caradoc.them.org>
[not found] ` <47F17A97.1000408@eagercon.com>
2008-04-01 1:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-01 17:07 ` Anmol P. Paralkar
2008-04-01 17:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-01 20:23 ` Anmol P. Paralkar
2008-04-01 20:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080401203615.GA5522@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=b07584@freescale.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox