From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12051 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2008 17:13:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 12039 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Apr 2008 17:13:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:12:50 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72909983BE; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:12:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419B898119; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:12:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jgk2R-0006tW-36; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:12:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:13:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "Anmol P. Paralkar" Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Regenerate config/features/rs6000 Message-ID: <20080401171247.GA26455@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Anmol P. Paralkar" , gdb@sourceware.org References: <47F16D39.4040608@eagercon.com> <20080331234135.GA29623@caradoc.them.org> <47F17A97.1000408@eagercon.com> <20080401010823.GA1649@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 12:07:16PM -0500, Anmol P. Paralkar wrote: > Assume that you are adding support for 'newarch' (say under powerpc). Why do you even need this? You should be able to generate the C file from an existing PowerPC even before teaching it about the new architecture variant. If that doesn't work then you can't provide new variants over remote, which would defeat the point. If there was an error, please let me know. Meanwhile, I'd love to remove the circular dependency, but I haven't thought of a way to do it yet. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery