From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2101 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2008 12:10:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 2089 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Mar 2008 12:10:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:10:30 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1ED98278; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:10:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7260D98149; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:10:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JcJb9-0001kA-Um; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:10:19 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:22:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Async function calls Message-ID: <20080320121019.GA6677@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200803201044.47454.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200803201044.47454.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:44:46AM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Maybe, somebody have bright ideas? Could we pick out the inferior function calls and evaluate them first, with continuations? Except that could change order of evaluation; we'd have to read the values of variables at the same time. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery