From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13815 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2008 16:51:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 13807 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Mar 2008 16:51:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:50:44 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEE098149; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 16:50:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA90098119; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 16:50:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JXJIn-0000YX-J1; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:50:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:52:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Write watchpoints Message-ID: <20080306165041.GA2034@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <15867705.post@talk.nabble.com> <20080306131325.GA21308@caradoc.them.org> <200803061945.21053.ghost@cs.msu.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200803061945.21053.ghost@cs.msu.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 07:45:20PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > I noticed that HAVE_CONTINUABLE_WATCHPOINT macro has some definitions, > but is never checked. Should we kill it? Yes, probably. I thought I'd cleaned that up; if I had a reason to leave the definitions, I've forgotten what it was. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery