From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28280 invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2008 13:40:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 28269 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Feb 2008 13:40:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:40:10 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D323983A1; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:40:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FF29831E; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:40:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JV5T2-0000kg-EC; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:40:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:41:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Shaun Jackman Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Modifying a verboten register Message-ID: <20080229134004.GA2573@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Shaun Jackman , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <7f45d9390605040745o4c332058te1e289e5d5e9620@mail.gmail.com> <20060504145211.GB32605@nevyn.them.org> <7f45d9390605040815x5be2bcb8t921b2dd528335565@mail.gmail.com> <7f45d9390607121616j39879186x760c2d14f54dc49@mail.gmail.com> <7f45d9390802282037n3d43c1dcm3409bac64ab24827@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7f45d9390802282037n3d43c1dcm3409bac64ab24827@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00257.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:37:58PM -0800, Shaun Jackman wrote: > Was this patch ever applied to the trunk? I've just checked that the > bug still exists in gdb 6.7. The above patch was from 2006-July circa > gdb 6.5 days. That patch will not be applied; as I mentioned at the time, it's a nasty hack. Unfortunately, no one has had time to work on this problem. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery