Re: Small remote file transfer protocol adition

Pedro Alves
2008-01-31T18:15:48Z

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:51:58PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> Well, since you ask :-) I'd prefer my first suggestion, just
>> because it's simpler. No worries about buffer size
>> limits, and the message being truncated. If passing a message,
>> I'd have to be careful with what I'd say there, so it
>> doesn't confuse the user (strerror says one thing, native
>> error says something similar but not the same, possibly in
>> different locales). This probably means I'd just pass the error
>> number anyway.
>
> Yes, I see. I'm convinced.
>

Proposed patch posted here:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-01/msg00860.html

--
Pedro Alves