Re: Finding ld.so dynamic loader

[Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>]

> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:05:38 -0800
> From: Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com>
> 
> Paul Koning wrote:
> >>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com> writes:
> > 
> >  Michael> Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >  >> GDB tries to please them all, and still tries to cover the case of
> >  >> a native debugger too.
> > 
> >  Michael> It still seems that searching the host file system should be
> >  Michael> the last choice, not the first. 
> > 
> > It should either be the last choice, or not be done at all.  An
> > example where it should not be done at all is when host and target are
> > different architectures.  Looking up a symbol in an x86 library when
> > you're debugging a MIPS target cannot ever be correct -- but that's
> > what can happen today.  (This is also an example of something that can
> > easily be checked by the solib code without worrying about the
> > "remote" vs. "local" distinction -- if host != target then by
> > definition the host libraries are wrong.)
> 
> It's certainly incorrect to look up a symbol when the host
> and target architectures are different.  But it's also
> incorrect when the architectures are the same but the library
> versions are different.  For example, debugging a x86 Linux 2.4
> target with an x86 Linux 2.6 host.  I'd rather see a fix which
> handles both situations.

Bad example; Linux kernel versions have very little to do with this
and if both systems use the same userland things would work fine.

> Essentially, any time gdb is working with a remote target,
> searching the host file system should be suppressed.

I'm not sure everybody would agree with you here, although one could
argue that if people would want to search the host filesystem in this
case, they can always set solib-absolute-prefix and/or
solib-search-path.